According to Michael Lamont, a partner at Spoor & Fisher who specialises in combatting counterfeiting in southern Africa, counterfeit goods are estimated to cost the South African economy billions of rands on an annual basis.

When considering the associated loss of tax revenue, the true cost of counterfeiting could be much higher – and the problem seems to be getting worse.

Given the current economic climate in South Africa and in many of our neighbouring countries, there is a steady increase in the demand for cheaper goods. This demand is often satisfied through the purchase and consumption of counterfeit goods, causing the counterfeiting marketing to grow at a steady and unprecedented rate.

Lamont states that counterfeit or fake goods are generally perceived to be limited to clothing, footwear and other luxury items, but in truth no product, brand or industry is immune. Counterfeit goods, in fact, include everyday products such as spices, instant yeasts, sanitary pads and extend to technologically advanced products, including batteries, fire retardant suits and vehicle components.

Hardly a week goes by without the topic of counterfeit goods being thrust into the media.

Whether it be civil concern pieces pertaining to the deadly impact suspected counterfeit goods inflict on end consumers, or the South African Police Service (SAPS) or South African Revenue Service (Sars) announcing another major counterfeit goods bust, it is clear that counterfeiting is on the increase.

While it is clear that both Sars and the SAPS are committed to combatting the importation and sale of counterfeit goods, law enforcement is limited in their capabilities and resources to effectively combat counterfeiting.

Due to capacity and manpower limitations, it is impossible for Sars to physically inspect each and every consignment imported into South Africa, a similar problem faced throughout Africa. These limitations are further compounded by the sophisticated criminal networks responsible for the importation and sale of counterfeit goods, which rarely provide law enforcement with accurate information and seldom provide links to the main role players or suppliers.

Trade mark and copyright owners, in conjunction with law firms, are primarily responsible for enforcement against counterfeit goods bearing and infringing upon their intellectual property rights.

Enforcement is comprised of proactive and reactive strategies, with proactive strategies reliant on market surveys and monitoring, investigations and targeted operations.

The importance of market surveys and monitoring cannot be understated. Due to the speed at which the counterfeit industry evolves, identifying counterfeit goods becomes difficult and heavy reliance is placed on these alternative anti-counterfeiting strategies.

It is also imperative to have a holistic view of the counterfeit market, including neighbouring countries. This is specifically relevant given the international nature of the criminal networks responsible for distributing and selling counterfeit goods.

Counterfeiting is a crime that directly affects its victims and has potentially deadly consequences.

Lamont says there are various types of victims of counterfeiting, and that no sector is immune.

Consumers, who typically purchase counterfeit goods naively, deceived by their resemblance to genuine products or due to their desire to pay less. While counterfeit goods are often seen to be predominantly fashion and luxury goods, counterfeits also include fake pharmaceuticals, cosmetics and FMCG products, with the risk being the danger to one’s health associated with taking medicines and consuming FMCG goods of unknown quality. The World Health Organisation estimates that approximately 100 000 people in Africa die every year due to counterfeit pharmaceuticals.

Legitimate businesses suffer substantial losses due to counterfeiting through loss of revenue and profits. That translates into job losses and slower growth, not counting the potential reputational damage when counterfeiters pass off subpar products as the original items. It is important to note that in some African countries, it is not uncommon for counterfeit goods to be sold in established retail malls, often within close proximity to a legitimate retailer.

Intellectual property owners invest substantial resources in creating and maintaining their brands. “When counterfeiters exploit these brands, it undermines the value and integrity of intellectual property,” says Lamont. “A trade mark at its most basic is a badge of origin, a badge consumers identify with and place their trust in.” Counterfeit goods take unfair advantage of the value placed in a specific brand by the consumer with little regard for the damage or harm these goods pose.

Lost tax revenue, with the estimated losses associated with counterfeiting reaching into the billions each year. The general non-compliance of tax regulations by counterfeiters, further compounded by the negative effect that counterfeiting has on legitimate business, makes it difficult to quantify the loss of revenue to any country, however, it is clear that the loss is substantial.

Global economy: Counterfeiting is a global issue with far-reaching consequences. It undermines international trade relations, impacts investor confidence and is even associated with the funding of criminal and terrorist organisations.

Despite the challenges faced in combatting counterfeiting in Africa – such as porous borders, non-specific legislation and limited resources – there is renewed commitment at national levels throughout Africa to combat the importation and sale of counterfeit goods, specifically to protect intellectual property rights, encourage foreign investment and curtail the loss in tax revenue.

Brought to you by Spoor & Fisher.

Moneyweb does not endorse any product or service being advertised in sponsored articles on our platform.



Source_link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Start your own DFY AMAZON affiliate website now! Buy here for $25.00 Buy here for $25.00Close